What is the expense ratio of IEMG vs IWF?

IEMG has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while IWF has an expense ratio of 0.18%.

IEMG vs IWF

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF

Last updated: 2026-04-02

IEMG iShares

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) is an exchange-traded fund issued by iShares that provides exposure to stocks in emerging market economies with higher growth potential. It charges a low expense ratio of 0.09%. The fund offers an attractive dividend yield of 2.63%. Launched in 2012, the fund has a 14-year track record.

AUM: $132.2B ER: 0.09% Yield: 2.63% Since: Oct 18, 2012

IWF iShares

iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) is an exchange-traded fund issued by iShares that provides exposure to large-cap U.S. growth stocks with above-average earnings potential. It charges a moderate expense ratio of 0.18%. The fund offers a modest dividend yield of 0.39%. Launched in 2000, the fund has a 26-year track record.

AUM: $108.0B ER: 0.18% Yield: 0.39% Since: May 22, 2000

Quick Verdict

IEMG has a slightly lower expense ratio (0.09% vs 0.18%), saving about $178 per $10,000 over 10 years. Over the past year, IEMG has significantly outperformed with a 29.6% return vs 18.2%. Income investors may prefer IEMG for its higher yield (2.6% vs 0.4%).

Key Metrics

Metric	IEMG	IWF
Expense Ratio	0.09%	0.18%
Dividend Yield	2.6%	0.4%
Fund Family	iShares	iShares
Category	Emerging Markets	US Large Cap Growth

Performance Chart

Indexed to 100 at start (5-year comparison)

IEMG +7.7%

IWF +71.3%

Performance Comparison

Period	IEMG	IWF	Difference
1 Month	-6.83%	-4.73%	-2.10%
3 Months	+1.86%	-8.83%	+10.69%
6 Months	+5.01%	-8.48%	+13.49%
YTD	+1.86%	-8.83%	+10.69%
1 Year	+29.64%	+18.20%	+11.44%
3 Years	+43.63%	+75.80%	-32.17%
5 Years	+7.71%	+71.26%	-63.55%

Fee Impact Over Time

Estimated fee cost difference assuming 8% annual returns

Investment	Period	IEMG Fees	IWF Fees	You Save
$10.000	10 years	$179	$357	$178
$10.000	20 years	$771	$1.529	$759
$10.000	30 years	$2.486	$4.912	$2.426
$50.000	10 years	$896	$1.786	$889
$50.000	30 years	$12.428	$24.558	$12.131
$100.000	30 years	$24.855	$49.116	$24.261

Risk Metrics

Based on 5 years of daily returns

Metric	IEMG	IWF
Annualized Volatility	18.1%	21.4%
Max Drawdown	-38.5%	-33.1%
Sharpe Ratio	-0.08	0.40

Dividend Comparison

Metric	IEMG	IWF
Annual Dividend (per share)	$1.85	$1.69
Dividend Yield	2.63%	0.39%
Distribution Frequency	Semi-Annual or Annual	Quarterly

Top Holdings

0 of top 9 holdings overlap (0% overlap in top holdings)

IEMG Top Holdings

Name	Weight
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited!tpe/2330	11.60%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.!krx/005930	4.66%
Tencent Holdings Limited!hkg/0700	3.32%
SK hynix Inc.!krx/000660	2.75%
Alibaba Group Holding Limited!hkg/9988	2.22%
China Construction Bank Corporation!hkg/0939	0.82%
Delta Electronics, Inc.!tpe/2308	0.76%
HDFC Bank Limited!nse/HDFCBANK	0.75%
Reliance Industries Limited!nse/RELIANCE	0.71%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.!tpe/2317	0.65%

IWF Top Holdings

Name	Weight
NVIDIA CorporationNVDA	12.82%
Apple Inc.AAPL	11.79%
Microsoft CorporationMSFT	8.78%
Broadcom Inc.AVGO	4.81%
Amazon.com, Inc.AMZN	4.61%
Tesla, Inc.TSLA	3.57%
Meta Platforms, Inc.META	3.28%
Alphabet Inc.GOOG	2.83%
Eli Lilly and CompanyLLY	2.62%

Which One Should You Choose?

Choose IEMG if...

you want the lowest fees and plan to buy and hold long-term. Over decades, the expense ratio difference compounds significantly.

Choose IEMG if...

recent performance momentum matters to your strategy. Note that past performance doesn't guarantee future results.

Choose IEMG if...

you prioritize dividend income and want higher regular distributions from your portfolio.

Related Comparisons

AGG vs IEMG AGG vs IWF BND vs IEMG BND vs IWF BNDX vs IEMG BNDX vs IWF DGRO vs IEMG DGRO vs IWF