What is the expense ratio of LIT vs TAN?

LIT has an expense ratio of 0.75%, while TAN has an expense ratio of 0.70%.

LIT vs TAN

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF vs Invesco Solar ETF

Last updated: 2026-04-02

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) is an exchange-traded fund that provides exposure to thematic - lithium & battery securities. It charges a high expense ratio of 0.75%. The fund offers a modest dividend yield of 0.42%. Launched in 2010, the fund has a 16-year track record.

AUM: $1.7B ER: 0.75% Yield: 0.42% Since: Jul 22, 2010

TAN

Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) is an exchange-traded fund that provides exposure to thematic - clean energy securities. It charges a high expense ratio of 0.70%. Launched in 2008, the fund has a 18-year track record.

AUM: $1.5B ER: 0.70% Yield: N/A Since: Apr 15, 2008

Quick Verdict

TAN has a slightly lower expense ratio (0.70% vs 0.75%), saving about $94 per $10,000 over 10 years. Over the past year, LIT has significantly outperformed with a 92.8% return vs 82.7%.

Key Metrics

Metric	LIT	TAN
Expense Ratio	0.75%	0.70%
Dividend Yield	0.4%	N/A
Fund Family	N/A	N/A
Category	Thematic - Lithium & Battery	Thematic - Clean Energy

Performance Chart

Indexed to 100 at start (5-year comparison)

LIT +23.0%

TAN -36.2%

Performance Comparison

Period	LIT	TAN	Difference
1 Month	-1.04%	-0.16%	-0.88%
3 Months	+12.33%	+9.05%	+3.28%
6 Months	+26.43%	+22.38%	+4.05%
YTD	+12.33%	+9.05%	+3.28%
1 Year	+92.80%	+82.69%	+10.11%
3 Years	+17.60%	-26.31%	+43.91%
5 Years	+23.00%	-36.17%	+59.17%

Fee Impact Over Time

Estimated fee cost difference assuming 8% annual returns

Investment	Period	LIT Fees	TAN Fees	You Save
$10.000	10 years	$1.453	$1.359	$94
$10.000	20 years	$6.064	$5.684	$380
$10.000	30 years	$18.984	$17.834	$1.150
$50.000	10 years	$7.266	$6.796	$470
$50.000	30 years	$94.918	$89.170	$5.748
$100.000	30 years	$189.836	$178.339	$11.496

Risk Metrics

Based on 5 years of daily returns

Metric	LIT	TAN
Annualized Volatility	31.6%	39.8%
Max Drawdown	-67.0%	-74.1%
Sharpe Ratio	0.15	-0.14

Dividend Comparison

Metric	LIT	TAN
Annual Dividend (per share)	$0.32	$0.00
Dividend Yield	0.42%	0.00%
Distribution Frequency	Semi-Annual or Annual	None

Top Holdings

0 of top 10 holdings overlap (0% overlap in top holdings)

LIT Top Holdings

Name	Weight
Rio Tinto GroupRIO	20.53%
Albemarle CorporationALB	7.41%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.!krx/006400	4.76%
Panasonic Holdings Corporation!tyo/6752	4.27%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.!she/002460	4.26%
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.SQM	4.09%
PLS Group Limited!asx/PLS	3.98%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.!she/002371	3.80%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited!she/300750	3.72%
BYD Co Ltd Class HBY6.DE	3.19%

TAN Top Holdings

Name	Weight
First Solar, Inc.FSLR	9.82%
Nextpower Inc.NXT	9.80%
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd!tlv/ENLT	6.44%
Enphase Energy, Inc.ENPH	6.34%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.SEDG	5.44%
Sunrun Inc.RUN	4.87%
GCL Technology Holdings Limited!hkg/3800	4.42%
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.HASI	4.20%
Solaria Energía y Medio Ambiente, S.A.!bme/SLR	4.18%
Doral Group Renewable Energy Resources Ltd!tlv/DORL	3.58%

Which One Should You Choose?

Choose TAN if...

you want the lowest fees and plan to buy and hold long-term. Over decades, the expense ratio difference compounds significantly.

Choose LIT if...

recent performance momentum matters to your strategy. Note that past performance doesn't guarantee future results.

Related Comparisons

ICLN vs LIT ICLN vs TAN